Renewable Energy - 17th May 2023

Here are the climate-related sections of speeches by MPs during the Commons debate Renewable Energy.

Full text: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-05-17/debates/60BF50A9-04E4-4F3B-9A0D-F5E66B271673/RenewableEnergy

Ian Blackford (Ross, Skye and Lochaber) (SNP)

2. What recent discussions he has had with the Scottish Government on support for renewable energy in Scotland.

[Source]

Martyn Day (Linlithgow and East Falkirk) (SNP)

4. What recent discussions he has had with the Scottish Government on support for renewable energy in Scotland.

[Source]

Tommy Sheppard (Edinburgh East) (SNP)

6. What recent discussions he has had with the Scottish Government on support for renewable energy in Scotland.

[Source]

Marion Fellows (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP)

12. What recent discussions he has had with the Scottish Government on support for renewable energy in Scotland.

[Source]

John Lamont (Conservative)

By law, transmission network charging is a matter for Ofgem as the independent regulator. Transmission charges are set to reflect the costs imposed on the grid by generators and demand in different locations. That means that generators in Scotland pay higher charges than counterparts in England and Wales, reflecting the higher levels of transmission investment they drive. Ofgem recognises the importance of transmission charges to the deployment of Scottish renewable generation and the current concerns over the viability and cost reflectivity of charges. That is a key reason why Ofgem announced a programme of transmission charging reforms. I can confirm to the right hon. Gentleman that I recently met the Under-Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, my hon. Friend the Member for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine (Andrew Bowie) to discuss what more the UK Government can do to address the concerns he has highlighted.

[Source]

Tommy Sheppard

Billions of pounds of renewable energy projects are currently stalled because there is no capacity to connect to the national grid. Some companies have been told that it will take 15 years. The Government’s failure to invest in interconnectors and grid capacity is not only hindering investment, but is harming the achievement of net zero. Given this failure, on top of the failures with connection charges and with hydrogen, does it not make a compelling case to transfer responsibility for energy supply and distribution to Scotland, where we can get the job done?

[Source]

11:44 Marion Fellows

According to the Chancellor, the UK Government’s windfall tax is set to generate £40 billion over six years, and the Minister for Nuclear claimed that taxes on Scotland’s oil and gas sector covered half of the UK energy bill last winter. Until now, however, this Government have failed to support the Acorn carbon capture and storage project in north-east Scotland. Do the Secretary of State and his Minister accept that windfall taxes from Scottish oil and gas should be used not just to pay short-term bills, but to invest in Scotland’s transition to net zero economy?

[Source]

11:46 Sir Paul Beresford (Mole Valley) (Con)

Does my hon. Friend agree that, although renewable energy provides a considerable proportion of Scottish and UK power, if we are to hit net zero, nuclear power is and will be required to fulfil a large proportion of the additional power demand? Has my hon. Friend had any discussions with the Scottish Government on building nuclear reactors, especially small reactors, in Scotland?

[Source]

11:46 John Lamont (Conservative)

I absolutely share my hon. Friend’s belief that nuclear plays an important part in the UK’s energy strategy. This UK Government’s “Powering up Britain” strategy is a blueprint for the future of energy in this country. We will diversify, decarbonise and incentivise new energy production by investing in both renewables and the nuclear sector. By setting Britain on course to greater energy independence, “Powering up Britain” will deliver energy security, of which nuclear will be a key part.

[Source]

John Lamont (Conservative)

Absolutely not. At the Budget, the Chancellor announced £20 billion of funding to store as much carbon and create as many jobs as possible through track 1 and beyond—unprecedented investment in the development of carbon capture, usage and storage. The Government have also announced around £2 billion in investment for CCUS, hydrogen and industrial decarbonisation technologies. We have already confirmed that the Acorn project in the north-east of Scotland seems to meet the track 2 criteria, and we look forward to working with the project to ensure that we get some good news as soon as possible.

[Source]

See all Parliamentary Speeches Mentioning Climate